Watts v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

McDONALD, J.,

Agreeing in part and dissenting in part.

|TI must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in several respects. First, on the issue of solidary obligors and the finding of liability on Dow; secondly, on affirming the trial court’s refusal to grant a directed verdict on behalf of the defendants; and thirdly, applying the wrong standard of review to the jury’s award of general damages. However, having made the determination that Dow and Hebert Brothers were both liable, I be*66lieve the majority is correct in finding the quantum award should be reduced as Hebert Brothers is only…