Legal Opinion

Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Flanigan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1966No. 42241, 42242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

A petition in tort for fraud and deceit predicated upon false and fraudulent representations, made by a duly authorized agent of an insurance company in the sale of a life insurance policy, that the plaintiff would share in the company’s profits, that the defendant guaranteed an annual return of not less than 6 percent, and possibly as much as 15 percent, and that the plaintiff could at her option withdraw any part or all of the sums paid to the company, failed to state a cause of action because the representations upon which the action is predicated were promises and conjectures…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clinton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Cosby v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Crozier v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Ambrose v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Strickland v. Levy's of Savannah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Hertz Corporation v. Donald Cox and Sarah C. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Motors Insurance Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Williams v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  4. Fitzgerald Forest Products, L.P. v. Durand Raute Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1996
  5. Flanigan v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API