Legal Opinion

Westover v. Carman's Estate

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1896No. 6799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, 0.

Westover was appointed administrator cum testamento anncxo of the estate of Walter Carman. It would seem that he was removed, but this fact appears merely inferentially in the record. On the coming in of his account there was a hearing in the county court and certain credits claimed by him were disallowed; and he was charged with interest on moneys in his possession. He appealed to the district court, where a decree was rendered substantially conforming to that in the county court. From this decree he prosecutes error.

In the brief only three items are discussed, — a charge of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. McCloskey v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  3. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Boschulte v. SchoettgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API