Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Cinco

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHugh S. Coyle, J.

In this action for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, defendant has moved this court for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and for an order pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the following subdivisions of said rule: pursuant to subdivision 2 on the ground that the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue; pursuant to subdivision 5, upon the ground that the alleged cause of action did not accrue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. AndersNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolgin v. DolginNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API