Sperry v. Flygare
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Kandiyohi county, Powers, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is an action to restrain and enjoin the defendants, board of county commissioners and auditor of Kandiyohi county, from issuing and negotiating the bonds of the county under and pursuant to Laws 1895, c. 302, to pay the cost and expense of locating and establishing a public highway under the terms of such law. Defendants demurred to the complaint, and appealed from an order overruling the same.
The act under which defendants are threatening to proceed, and which fully warrants the threatened action if valid and constitutional, is an evident attempt on the part of the legislature to extend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- State ex rel. Stateler v. ReisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Dowlan v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Graham v. CongerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Day v. McQuillanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Foot v. BazilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- McGee v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Skyllingstad v. GunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Kasper v. Minnesota Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Murray v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.