Legal Opinion
Marsh Investment Corporation v. John Langford, Pontchartrain State Bank v. William M. Justice, Clerk of Court, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1981No. 80-3608PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
The summary judgment in favor of the Marsh Investment Corporation is AFFIRMED on the basis of the district court’s memorandum opinion, 490 F.Supp. 1320, entered June 3, 1980, United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, Civil Action No. 79-2020, Section “E”.
The district court correctly concluded that the Pontchartrain State Bank’s third-party demand against the underwriters was a “separate and independent” cause of action that was joined with non-removable actions, so that the entire case filed in state court was properly removed to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c); Carl…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carl Heck Engineers, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury, Defendant-Third Party v. Maryland Casualty Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Marsh Investment Corp. v. LangfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Marsh Investment Corp. v. LangfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
3Cited by39 opinions
- South Louisiana Bank v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- First National Bank of Pulaski v. John T. Curry, Defendants/counter and Third-Party Henry, Henry & Speer, P.C., Defendants/third-Party William R. Horne, Third-Party Johnnie M. Curry v. First National Bank of Pulaski, Henry, Henry & Speer, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- First National Bank v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Wilson Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Aaron-Lincoln Mercury, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.