Planck v. Bishop
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, .1. cited: Hutchinson v. State, 19 Neb. 267; Grigg v. People, 31 Mich. 471; Aylesworth v. State, 65 111. 301; Grader v. State, 54 Ind. 159 ; 1 Greenleaf on Evidence 13th Ed. sec. 445; Davis v. Neligh, 7 ■ Neb. 84; Boggs v. Thompson, 13 Id. 403 ; Cool' v. Boche, Hall & Bay, 15 Id. 24; McFarland v. People, 72 111. 368; McCoy v. People, 65 Id. 439; McClellan v. State, 28 N.W.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, .1. cited: Hutchinson v. State, 19 Neb. 267; Grigg v. People, 31 Mich. 471; Aylesworth v. State, 65 111. 301; Grader v. State, 54 Ind. 159 ; 1 Greenleaf on Evidence 13th Ed. sec. 445; Davis v. Neligh, 7 ■ Neb. 84; Boggs v. Thompson, 13 Id. 403 ; Cool' v. Boche, Hall & Bay, 15 Id. 24; McFarland v. People, 72 111. 368; McCoy v. People, 65 Id. 439; McClellan v. State, 28 N.W. Rep. 347; State of Iowa v. Smith, 16 Id. 585.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
On May 21, 1887, the defendant in error filed a complaint on oath before the county judge of Holt- county wherein she swears that she is an unmarried woman residing in Holt county, and that on the 26th of April, 1887, she was delivered of a bastard child, and that Charles M. Planck is the father of said child. An examination was thereupon had before said county judge, and Planck was required to enter into a recognizance for his appearance at the next term of the district court of Holt county. At the next term of the district court, a trial was had, and Planck was found guilty. This verdict,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schreckengast v. EalyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. CassadySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920