GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY v. Shook
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant-buyer was entitled to inspect the goods after their arrival. G.S. 25-2-513(1). Since part of the goods failed to conform to the contract, the buyer could accept any commercial unit and reject the rest. G.S. 25-2-601 (c). Such rejection must have been made within, a reasonable time after delivery and the plaintiff-seller seasonably notified. Defendant was also under a duty after rejection to hold the rejected goods with reasonable care at the seller’s disposition for a time sufficient to permit the seller to remove them. Nothing else appearing, the buyer had no further…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Mitchell v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heating & Air Conditioning Associates, Inc. v. MyerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- HEATING & AIR COND. ASSOC., INC. v. MyerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Lykins Oil Co. v. FekkosClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1986