Legal Opinion

City of New Albany v. Strack

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1915No. 8,479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Clark Circuit Court; Harry C. Montgomery, Judge. Action by Louis E. Strack against the City of New Albany. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

It is very earnestly insisted by appellee that no question is presented in this case for the reason that appellant has failed to incorporate in its brief the amended complaint upon which issue was joined, and the cause tried. Because of the earnest insistence on the part of appellee’s counsel and in view of the fact that we have not been supplied with any additional information by appellant, the court has gone to the record to determine the facts. On page 6 of the record, down to and including page 12, we find certified by the clerk of the Ployd Circuit Court,' complaint in two paragraphs.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aydelott v. CollingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Evansville Suburban & Newburgh Railway Co. v. LavenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. English v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. City of Huntington v. FolkIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. English v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API