Legal Opinion

State v. Faggin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 24, 2014No. 2014-K-0326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

|, Granted. The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to quash her pending prosecution for possession of hydroco-done in violation of La.R.S. 40:967(0(2), and the court of appeal erred in affirming that ruling. State v. Faggin, 13-0617 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1/15/14), 2014 WL 529957 (Bagneris, Lombard, JJ., Lobrano, J. dissenting) (unpub’d).

As a general rule, “[t]he motion to quash is essentially a mechanism by which to raise pre-trial pleas of defense, i. e. those matters which do not go to the merits of the charge.... While evidence may be adduced, such may not include a defense on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. State v. LoveLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. State Of Louisiana v. Van HopkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. State of Iowa v. Alfred Anthony GallardoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  4. State of Louisiana v. Macqael BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API