Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Schimmels
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1967No. Civ. 23857PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint of appellants Frank and Mary Schneider on the ground that the causes of action stated are barred by the one-year statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc. § 340, subd. 3.) Mary’s cause of action is to recover for an assault allegedly committed upon her by respondent. Frank, her husband, seeks to recover damages for the loss of her services and consortium caused by the alleged assault. The demurrer to Frank’s cause of action was sustained on the ground that no damages for loss of consortium are recoverable in California.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.