Legal Opinion
Dowst Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided February 17, 1969No. P69/40; protests 66/15758-15082, etc. (Chicago)Published
1Opinion of the CourtMaletz, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gamble Vargish & Co. v. Untied StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966