Musgrave v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The motions for nonsuits and directed verdicts were properly denied.
There was evidence from which the following facts might be found. For many years prior to April 22, 1929, the deceased was employed by the defendant Great Falls Manufacturing company as a second hand in its bleachery in Somersworth. Upon that date the Great Falls Manufacturing company conveyed its plant to the defendant, Dwight Manufacturing company, and the deceased continued to do the same work as a servant of the latter company until July, 1929, when he left its employ on account of the illness from which his death…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tullgren v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Chiuchiolo v. New England Wholesale TailorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- West v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Kenney v. Wong LenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Gobrecht v. BeckwithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Evinger v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Dr. Pepper Company v. HeimanWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Perreault v. Allen Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Weiss v. WassermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.