Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. City of Whitesboro

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1926No. 865-4526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Defendant in error, the city of Whitesboro, is a municipal corporation organized under the general laws of the estate of Texas. In 1.8S7 it acquired exclusive control of the public free schools within its limits. On August 9, 1909, by ordinance duly ádopted, it extended its corporate limits for school purposes only under the provisions of article 2883, R. S. 1911 (Acts 1905, p. 263, § 148).

During the- years 1918, 1919, and 1920, plaintiff in error owned 1.27 miles of railway within the city as originally incorporated, and 3.56 miles within the limits as extended for school purposes only. Por…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Rockdale v. CuretonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Snyder v. Baird Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. City of WhitesboroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warbritton v. School Board of MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1946
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1944
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API