Legal Opinion

Picard v. Waggoner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffith, O. J.

The declaration alleges that appellant, the defendant in the trial court, was the owner of a property on Kuhn Street between East Howard Avenue and East Beach Street in Biloxi, and that appellee, the plaintiff was a guest of the defendant, and that said defendant “negligently allowed an open vent to a sewer approximately six inches in diameter to remain open and unprotected among some grass and weeds on her property and the plaintiff ... at or about 9:15 P.M. on the night of August 30, 1945 stepped onto this open vent to the sewer and received painful and lasting damages . . .…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldin v. LipkindSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Floyd O. Crawford and Wife, Mrs. Floyd O. Crawford v. J. C. Worth and Wife, Mrs. J. C. Worth, D/B/A Worth Motor LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF HLTH. & REHAB. SERVICES v. HollisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Johnson v. BoydstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bailey v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API