Legal Opinion

Bartlett & Kling v. Willis Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1903Published

Garnishment.—Error to the Circuit Court of Knox County; the Hon. Georqe W. Thompson, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

Willis Manufacturing Company brought an attachment against Bruce and Looney & Brother, and caused Bartlett & Kling to be summoned as garnishees. The Looneys were non-residents, and were notified by publication, and were defaulted, and judgment was rendered against them for §400. Interrogatories to the garnishees were filed and answered, and an amended answer to the main interrogatory was filed, and judgment for §400 was rendered against the garnishees. They sued out this writ of error to reverse the judgment.

The garnishees stated in their answer that certain sums would become due in two or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chott v. Tivoli Amusement Co. ex rel. ThurstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Rankin v. SimondsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. Hindman, Michælis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Deffenbaugh v. AndrewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Mansfield v. Honduras Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API