Legal Opinion

Sepulveda v. Gray

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02769Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-02769-WBS-JDP 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED 14 DANIEL SHERMAN GRAY, ECF No. 8 15 Defendant. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 16 DAYS 17 18 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Daniel Gray, alleging defendant violated the 19 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189; California Health and 20 Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; California’s Civil Rights Act,

Cal. Civ.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API