Legal Opinion

Silberman v. Royal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover the value of a stolen vehicle under a policy of automobile insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Henderson, J.), dated August 2, 1990, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Royal Insurance Company.

In order to recover under a policy of insurance, the insured must show that he or she has an “insurable interest” in the property (see, Insurance Law § 3401; Scarola v Insurance Co., 31 NY2d 411). We find no triable issue as to the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Welch v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peker v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Azzato v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Azzato v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceNassau County District Court · 1994
  5. Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API