Legal Opinion
Commonwealth, Ex Rel. Park v. Kaiserman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1938No. Appeals, 127-130PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Schaeeee,
These are quo warranto proceedings brought at the relation of the district attorney of Allegheny County to determine the right of Nathan Kaiserman, Joseph Di Cenzo, James A. O’Mara and Frank Anzenberger to occupy the offices of councilmen in the Borough of McKees Rocks. To the suggestion answers were filed which met a demurrer by the district attorney. On the issue thus raised the court gave judgment of ouster against respondents, from which they appeal.
The Act of July 18, 1935, P. L. 1290, Sec. 2, which amends The General Borough Act of May 4, 1927, P. L. 519,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Commonwealth v. KrapfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Wells Township School District's DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Directors v. BlakesleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Gemeny v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Zaffarano v. Ambler Borough CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. DeCinti, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1978
- Commonwealth v. Morieka, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.