Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. SMILE

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2009No. 27,338Published

1DissentVigil, Judge

{57} I concur with the majority opinion except Part C in which it concludes that improperly admitting evidence before the jury that Defendant attempted to plead guilty did not constitute reversible error. For the reasons which follow, I respectfully submit that Defendant is entitled to a new trial in which the improper evidence is excluded from the jury’s consideration. Since the majority disagrees, I dissent.

FACTS

{58} On January 31, 2006, Officer Guinn arrested Defendant and booked him into the Otero County Detention Center on a felony charge of aggravated stalking. Officer Guinn noted that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API