State v. Terrio
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Appeal. Motion for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence. Motion sustained. The defendant was found guilty of the murder of Mathias Pare March 11, 1901, at or near Misc.y Stream between Brassua Lake and the Canadian Pacific Railroad, by the jury at the following September term of this court in Somerset County.
Read the full summary
Appeal. Motion for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence. Motion sustained. The defendant was found guilty of the murder of Mathias Pare March 11, 1901, at or near Misc.y Stream between Brassua Lake and the Canadian Pacific Railroad, by the jury at the following September term of this court in Somerset County. He filed amotion for a new trial at the same term, which having been heard by the presiding justice was overruled, and he thereupon appealed to the next term of the law court in 1902, where the case was entered and continued until the December term. In the meantime, at the…
1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.
At an adjourned session of the September term of the Supreme Judicial Court in Somerset County, in the year 1901, a verdict of guilty was rendered by the jury against the defendant, Alexander Terrio, upon an indictment against him for the murder of *19Mathias Pare on the eleventh day of March of that year. Thereupon at the same term of court, the defendant filed a motion to have the verdict set aside as against the evidence, accompanied by a certificate of his counsel that the motion was made in good faith and that the same was necessary for the protection of his rights. This motion was…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- State v. SilvaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- State v. CaliendoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- State v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- State v. NewcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.