Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 21, 2001No. 00-2014PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

This case presents a question this court previously reserved: what is the standard to be applied to a criminal defendant’s motion for a new trial where the claim is that the prosecution knowingly used perjured testimony.

Manuel González^González, convicted of drug conspiracy and money laundering offenses in Puerto Rico, sought a new trial based on what he asserts is newly discovered evidence that two government witnesses recanted their testimony against him after his trial. González says those two witnesses perjured themselves, and that the prosecution knew of at least one…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. Ramos-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. De La CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. CasasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Kenneth Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API