Hentz v. Wagner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The plaintiff in error herein has filed a brief which appears to reasonably sustain his assignments of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief, and has not offered any excuso for failure to do. so.
It is well settled that where the plaintiff in error has filed a complete record in the Supreme Court, and has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of the court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for such failure, the Supreme Court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment below may be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Lawton Nat. Bank v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Incorporated Town of Kusa v. BouggousSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Russell & Washington v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.