Legal Opinion
Nodaway Valley Bank v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided June 23, 1989No. 86-6098-CV-SJ-6PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION *
SACHS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bank (Nodaway Valley) seeks recovery on an officers and directors liability insurance policy for expenses and settlement funds advanced by it in underlying litigation. Bank officials had successfully defeated another bank’s takeover attempt by using a “squeeze-out” merger, and were thereafter sued by the disgruntled raider who was also dissatisfied with the appraised value of forfeited stock.
The court has heretofore, in orders entered June 21, 1988, and December 12, 1988, denied various legal defenses advanced by defendant insurer after…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- McLean v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Fohn v. Title Insurance Corp. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harbor Insurance Company v. Continental Bank CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Harbor Insurance v. Continental Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Raychem Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.