Hanna v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.
Denise E. Hanna (“Denise”)1 appeals the motion court’s denial of her Rule 29.152 motion following an evidentiary hearing on the basis the motion court clearly erred in denying her claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.
Facts and Procedural Background
Given the narrow scope of Denise’s appeal, we set forth only those facts necessary to complete our review. The record reveals that Ralph Hanna (“Ralph”) and Denise were married for twenty-eight years and had two sons, Phillip and Shawn. In November 2003, they were all…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BRANDY B. SHADDOX, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025