Legal Opinion

Grant v. Hexalon Real Estate, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 6, 1996No. 915338DPublished

1Opinion of the CourtBorenstein, J.

Third-parfy plaintiffs (“plaintiffs”) are seeking indemnification from third-parfy defendants for money paid in settlement of the underlying tort claim brought by Douglas Grant.5 Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For reasons set forth more fully below, plaintiffs’ motion is allowed, defendant’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

I. Overview

Douglas Grant, while employed by defendant, slipped and fell on the garage ramp of the State Street Bank Building on February 5, 1990 and suffered a serious head injury. Grant sued plaintiffs and Unicco Services Co., Inc., a contractor who provided snow…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. King Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Cape Cod Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Whittle v. Pagani Bros. Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Callahan v. A. J. Welch Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API