Legal Opinion

Davis v. Krum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J. A principal who knowingly receives the fruits of an unauthorized act of his agent, ratifies the act, and assumes the burdens which attach to it. —Watson v. Bigelow, 47 Mo. 413; Norton v. Bull, 43 Mo. 113. Where onelose money which, ex aequo et bono, belongs to another, the law implies a promise to pay it upon which an action may be maintained; and the former-will not be heard to deny the promise. —Robbins v. Insurance Go.,…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J. A principal who knowingly receives the fruits of an unauthorized act of his agent, ratifies the act, and assumes the burdens which attach to it. —Watson v. Bigelow, 47 Mo. 413; Norton v. Bull, 43 Mo. 113. Where onelose money which, ex aequo et bono, belongs to another, the law implies a promise to pay it upon which an action may be maintained; and the former-will not be heard to deny the promise. —Robbins v. Insurance Go., 12 Mo. 380 ; Mcgoffin v. Muldrow, 12 Mo. 512 ;. Ranada v. North, 14 Mo. 615. One who has paid money through a mistake of…

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

On the 17th of January last, we delivered an opinion in this case reversing the judgment of the circuit court, and entering judgment in this court for the plaintiff. We stated in the opinion that the respondent had not furnished us with a brief, and that we were therefore left to conjecture as to the grounds on which the case had been decided in the circuit court. It seems that the respondent’s counsel had filed a brief with the clerk, but copies of it had not been sent into the judges’ rooms, nor was there any memorandum, on the record to show that any such brief had been filed. When the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claflin v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  2. Koontz v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Third National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Watson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  5. McDonald v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fahy v. Springfield Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Hanson v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. First National Bank v. Badger Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Miller v. Missouri Fire Brick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API