Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Smith v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1947No. 4-8131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellee, Mrs. Ruby Reeves, was plaintiff in the circuit court. She claimed that she drank a Coca-Cola bottled by appellant, and that the bottled drink contained small particles of glass, some of which she swallowed, and which caused her-to suffer pain, discomfort, injuries and loss of time from her work. She recovered judgment for $500; and appellant brings this appeal. Two questions are argued, which we list and discuss.

I. The Sufficiency of the Evidence. The appellant says: “There is a total failure to prove, either by direct or circumstantial evidence, that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Southeast Ark. v. SpurlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Southeast Ar. v. MooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gustafson v. Gate City Co-Op CreamerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API