Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Smith v. Reeves
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
Appellee, Mrs. Ruby Reeves, was plaintiff in the circuit court. She claimed that she drank a Coca-Cola bottled by appellant, and that the bottled drink contained small particles of glass, some of which she swallowed, and which caused her-to suffer pain, discomfort, injuries and loss of time from her work. She recovered judgment for $500; and appellant brings this appeal. Two questions are argued, which we list and discuss.
I. The Sufficiency of the Evidence. The appellant says: “There is a total failure to prove, either by direct or circumstantial evidence, that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Southeast Ark. v. SpurlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Ark. v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Southeast Ar. v. MooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gustafson v. Gate City Co-Op CreamerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964