Legal Opinion

Antepenko v. Antepenko

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1990No. Civ. 7280Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This case involves post-divorce proceedings.

The parties were divorced in September 1988, and the divorce decree provided for a property division. We affirmed on appeal. Antepenko v. Antepenko, 549 So.2d 1357 (Ala.Civ.App.1989).

The original divorce decree specified provisions for the sale of some of the marital assets and distribution of the proceeds after payment of outstanding claims. The division of the net proceeds from the sale of the real property was to be one-third to the wife and two-thirds to the husband. The remaining cash funds on deposit with the clerk, after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KirkleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Small v. SmallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Kaleta v. KaletaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API