Landsman v. Tonawanda Publishing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with *1029the following Memorandum: Defendant published a news story inaccurately reporting that the infant Michael Landsman, Jr., had been charged with second-degree sodomy. In fact, the infant’s father, Michael Landsman, Sr., had been charged with that crime. We agree with defendant that its mistaken substitution of the suffix "Jr.” for "Sr.” should not result in liability (see, Chapadeau v Utica Observer-Dispatch, 38 NY2d 196, 200). Reading the statement complained of in the context of the entire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- James v. Gannett Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Mitchell v. Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hawks v. Record Printing & Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lee v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Yellon v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001