State v. Greenway
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon D. Ryan, Judge. This is an action in equity for an injunction to restrain the defendants from keeping and maintaining a saloon in the city of Oskaloosa. The cause was submitted in the district court on an agreed statement of facts. A temporary injunction was allowed by the court, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
It is not necessary to set out the agreed statement of facts in full. The defendants claim they have the right to keep and maintain the saloon by virtue of chapter 62 of the Acts of the Twenty-fifth General Assembly, entitled, “An act to tax the traffic in intoxicating liquors, and to regulate and control the same.” No question is made that the voters and *473city council of the city of Oskaloosa took such action as authorized the sale of intoxicating liquors under the provision of said law.
1 *4742 *473I. It is claimed in behalf of the state that the defendants have no right to maintain their saloon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Smith v. IngrahamNew York Supreme Court · 1827
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VanVlietSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Landt v. RemleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Sawyer v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- In re JohnstonNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916