Legal Opinion

Burleigh v. Keck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 19, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Sears

delivered the opinion of the court.

But two questions are presented. First, as to whether Keck, the owner of the second mortgage, or Burleigh, the assignee of the rights of the owner of the equity of redemption, was entitled to the rents and profits of the land during the period of redemption; and, second, whether Burleigh, having failed to prosecute his appeal from the order appointing the receiver, can now maintain this appeal from the order disposing of the funds collected by the receiver.

As to each question, we think that the contention of appellant must be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. DaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hurd v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. King v. GoodwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Adams v. GillIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lilly v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eggers v. AdlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  2. Carroll v. HaighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Trustees of Schools v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API