Legal Opinion

(PC) Arrant v. Santoro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 25, 2024No. 1:20-cv-01253Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN R. PLAINTIFF, No. 1:20-cv-01253-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 KELLY SANTORO, et al., (ECF No. 81) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed January 20 10, 2024. (ECF No. 81.) 21 I. 22 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API