Legal Opinion

Cnty. of Orange v. Cole

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 15, 2017No. G053375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.

*507INTRODUCTION

This is an appeal from a paternity order and a child support order. Our opinion addresses the interplay between Family Code section 7611, subdivision (d) ( *743section 7611(d) ),1 which defines a presumed parent, and section 7613, which addresses the legal responsibilities of a sperm donor. For the reasons we explain, a man can be a sperm donor and nevertheless be a presumed parent and responsible for child support under section 7611(d). Based on the evidence in this case, the man was a presumed parent, and we affirm the trial court's order so finding.

The sperm of Brian Jeffrey Cole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Martin O.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. R.M. v. T.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H.S. v. J.M. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Lapping v. Wydham Vacation Ownership, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API