Legal Opinion

Claim of Harisiades v. Sutter French Confections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, P. J.

Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision which discharged the Special Disability Fund (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 8) in an occupational disease case. It is appellants’ contention that claimant initially developed baker’s asthma which did not become disabling " until infection caused an intervening bronchiectasis and emphysema superimposed upon the asthmatic condition”; and from this premise appellants argue that the baker’s asthma was a prior, permanent impairment constituting a hindrance to employment, within the second-injury law (Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Brown v. Guilderland Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Claim of Freer v. New Process GearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Claim of O'Grady v. Sealright Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Claim of Murphy v. Riverside Gas & OilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Claim of Murphy v. Riverside Gas & OilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API