Claim of Harisiades v. Sutter French Confections
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, P. J.
Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision which discharged the Special Disability Fund (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 8) in an occupational disease case. It is appellants’ contention that claimant initially developed baker’s asthma which did not become disabling " until infection caused an intervening bronchiectasis and emphysema superimposed upon the asthmatic condition”; and from this premise appellants argue that the baker’s asthma was a prior, permanent impairment constituting a hindrance to employment, within the second-injury law (Workmen’s Compensation…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Brown v. Guilderland Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Freer v. New Process GearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of O'Grady v. Sealright Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Murphy v. Riverside Gas & OilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of Murphy v. Riverside Gas & OilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012