Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lord v. D & J Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2012-208267; No. 27376Published

1DissentJustice Kittredge

Today the Court holds that a merchant has a duty to provide a security guard where random acts of criminal violence occur miles away from the business. Because I believe, as a matter of law, that no such duty exists, I would affirm. It is also my judgment that a proper application of Gopal II would result in affirming the grant of summary judgment by *562the able trial judge. Bass v. Gopal, 395 S.C. 129, 716 S.E.2d 910 (2011). As a result, I respectfully dissent.

Respondent operates a check cashing business, known as Cash on the Spot, on Cherry Road in Rock Hill, South Carolina.6 On January 28,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shipes v. Piggly Wiggly St. Andrews, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Bass v. GOPAL, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Singletary v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Oblachinski v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Cole v. Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API