Artmart Linen Co. v. United States

Ford Judge:

The suit listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

1. That the merchandise covered by this protest consists of cotton lace doilies covered by entry No. 705293 dated July 13, 1950.

2. That the said doilies were produced from lace edging manufactured on a Barmen lace machine from cotton and rayon yarns, that said lace edging is first cut to size with the draw thread pulled so as to shape the lace edging into an unfinished circular lace doily and that the doily is completed by joining together both ends of the unfinished circular lace doily on a sewing…