Legal Opinion

Gehrig Hoban & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1966No. A.R.D. 210; Entry No. 778538PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

This is an action to review the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement which was reported as Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 613, Reap. *728Dec. 10947. The trial judge found the value contended for by the defendant, appellee herein, on the basis of cost of production, as defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165.

The parties have agreed that the merchandise involved herein is identified on the final list published by the Secretary of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swizzels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Schweppes (U.S.A.), Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Gehrig Hoban & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Dana Perfumes Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API