Legal Opinion

Loghry v. Capel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1965No. 51500PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ThoRNTON, J. —

Plaintiffs, purchasers of a duplex from defendants, bring this action for fraud in failing to disclose the duplex was constructed on improperly compacted filled ground.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife, ages 32 and 26. Defendants are husband and wife, the husband’s age is 41. The husbands are the principal actors.

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for the amount of repairs and incidental expenses due to the settling and cracking of the duplex claimed to be caused by the defective fill.

Defendant appeals urging* the evidence is insufficient to. prove representation,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Cohen v. VivianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Davis v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LENOX v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API