Legal Opinion
Jakeman v. State of Utah
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 26, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00102Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH David Ammon Jakeman, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE and MOTION FOR Plaintiff, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION State of Utah, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-102 DAK DBP Defendant. District Judge Dale A. Kimball Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Pending before the court are two motions. Plaintiff David Ammon Jakeman filed a Motion to Expedite Complaint (ECF No. 4.) and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 7.) The court will deny both motions. BACKGROUND As set forth in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Yu Kikumura v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. CruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. West of England Ship Owner's Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989