Legal Opinion · Dissent

Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2015No. 11-35517Published

1DissentCallahan, Circuit Judge

The State of Alaska appeals the District Court for the District of Alaska’s decision setting aside the Departure of Agriculture’s exemption of the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule. The majority holds that Alaska has standing to appeal based on a statutory entitlement— *972an option to collect a share of the revenue the United States makes from timber harvested from national forests in Alaska. See 16 U.S.C. § 500 (creating the National Forest Receipts Program). But Alaska does not have standing based on this statutory interest. A statutory provision is insufficient to establish…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API