Legal Opinion

W. B. Dickenson & Bro. v. Cowley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Brown District Court, In an action in a justice’s court, wherein Cowley was plaintiff and one George Parker was defendant, a constable, upon an order of attachment, seized and held 1,000 bushels of corn, and a lot of other property. Dickenson & Bro. served a written notice on Cowley, as authorized by § 1 of ch. 164, Laws of 1872, claiming said corn, and that the trial of the right of property would be had before the justice on a certain day. Such trial was had.

Read the full summary

Error from Brown District Court, In an action in a justice’s court, wherein Cowley was plaintiff and one George Parker was defendant, a constable, upon an order of attachment, seized and held 1,000 bushels of corn, and a lot of other property. Dickenson & Bro. served a written notice on Cowley, as authorized by § 1 of ch. 164, Laws of 1872, claiming said corn, and that the trial of the right of property would be had before the justice on a certain day. Such trial was had. Parker made no appearance to the action, nor to the attachment proceedings, at any time. As to him the justice continued…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The facts in this case are briefly as follows: Defendant in error commenced a suit before a justice of the peace against one George Parker, and caused an attachment to be issued and levied on a certain lot of corn. Plaintiffs in error came in under ch. 164 of the laws of 1872, and *273claimed the property. They claimed under a chattel mortgage given by Parker. The proceedings before the justice were commenced before the filing of this mortgage, and it is conceded by counsel for plaintiffs in error that if Cowley “acquired any right by virtue of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Repine v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Standard Implement Co. v. Lansing Wagon WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Mentzer v. EllisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Noyes v. CanadaUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API