The Queen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California; John J. De Haven, Judge. Suits in admiralty by M. Anderson against the steamship Queen, and by N. Jordan against the steamship Umatilla; Pacific Coast Steamship Company, claimant. Decrees for claimant, and libelants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
These cases were argued and submitted together. They are libels against the respective ships mentioned for alleged pilotage services. Both cases are alike, except that in that against the ship Umatilla a question is raised as to the sufficiency of the tender of the services sued for.
The cases were submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the libelant in each case was at all the times mentioned in the libel a duly licensed pilot of the port of San Francisco, holding a license from the United States local inspectors of steamships, and also one…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Ex Parte McNielSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Huse v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Arthur R. Kintner and Alyce KintnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Mobile Bar Pilots Ass'n v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938