Legal Opinion

Foster v. Rhinehart

New York City Court

Decided November 24, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Dwight A. Foster against Clark D. Bhinehart, as sheriff of Kings county. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.

In July, 1888, warrants of attachment were issued out of the supreme court in three certain actions pending against one Henry Cohen, and, by virtue of said warrants, a stock of clothing in the store at 85 Sands street was seized. The warrants of attachment were received from the sheriff’s office, by Deputy-Sheriff Cox, for execution. He thereupon called on the plaintiff’s attorney for an order for the appointment of keepers, and the attorney for the plaintiff in said three actions then wrote on a paper addressed “C. D. Rhinehart, Sheriff,” and bearing the titles of said three actions, as…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Wrecking Co. v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Daly v. KelleyMontana Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API