Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis ex rel. Deppelheuer v. Newman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Jlppeal from, St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge

This suit is brought to recover a special tax assessed against property of the defendants, on account of certain street improvements. The tax bill was issued more than five years prior to the commencement of the suit, and the statute of limitations is relied on as a defense. The suit is not founded upon a contract, but *139upon a liability created by statute. The action is brought to recover a special tax assessed under authority of law. (City of St. Louis, etc., v. Hardy, 35 Mo. 265.) It is personal as well as in rein, and the city is the substantial plaintiff. (St. Louis, etc., v. Clemens, 36…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. St. Louis National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. City of St. Louis ex rel. Carroll v. HardySupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Collector of Revenue of St. Louis v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. City of Jefferson v. WhippleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Seibert v. CoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API