Legal Opinion
Browne v. Moran
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 30, 1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These are two actions of tort, one brought by the wife and the other by her husband, to recover compensation for injuries and damages sustained by each of them on a public way through the collision of the automobile, owned by the wife and driven by the husband, in which both were riding, with an automobile alleged to have been operated negligently by the defendant. Although the female plaintiff was the owner of the automobile in which they were riding, it was being operated by her husband on his own business with the permission of the wife, who was riding with him for pleasure.
The declaration…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Foster v. Richard BusteedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Cambria v. JefferyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Wishnewsky v. Town of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Macheras v. SyrmopoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Saragan v. BousquetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.