Legal Opinion

In re Boehme

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 18, 1941No. 3550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

The court has considered the application of O. E. Lee to strike from the schedules in said cause the property therein described, the affidavits and the arguments of his counsel and of counsel for debtor.

The provisions of the Bankruptcy Act for agricultural compositions and extensions can have no application to a proceeding thereunder where the relation of debtor and creditor does not exist, or where debtor has included property in his petition and schedules in which he has no interest.

It has been held that to include property in respect to which the debtor can assert no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re TracyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  3. In re ChrismanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Karr v. KarrMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In re KofoedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
  3. In re TakanoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API