Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Youngstown v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1939No. 27823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The relator, the city of Youngstown, Ohio, in this action in mandamus brought originally in this court, seeks to compel the auditor and treasurer of Mahoning county, Ohio, to transfer and pay to the relator its share of the undivided local government fund of the county without the deduction for the payment of a note executed and delivered under the provisions of Section 5546-18, General Code (117 Ohio Laws, 855), passed as an emergency measure and effective June 9, 1938.

The case is submitted to this court upon the pleadings and the agreed statement of facts.

By virtue of Section 5546-18 as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Newburgh Hts. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Board of Trustees of The Tobacco Use Prevention & Control Foundation v. BoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Newburgh Hts. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State Ex Rel. Bond v. City of MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API