Legal Opinion

Hackley v. Oltz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1958No. 57-157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

105 So.2d 20 (1958)

J.I. HACKLEY, O.K. Hackley, and Ada Hackley, Appellants,

v.

Harry M. OLTZ, Harold F. Oltz, Roger D. Oltz, and Ar-Tik Systems, Incorporated, an Indiana corporation, Appellees.

No. 57-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

September 18, 1958.

Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for appellants.

Evans, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston & Simmons, Miami, for appellees.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants were plaintiffs in the trial court. They brought a complaint in chancery alleging that they are the owners of some 40% of the stock of defendant, Ar-Tik Systems, Incorporated, an Indiana…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flight Equipment & Engineering Corp. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. News-Journal Corporation v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Tampa Water Works Co. v. WoodsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Chipola Valley Realty Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tillis v. United Parts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Gyorok v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Rogers v. RiddleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Serer v. CambiasoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API