C. I. T. Corp. v. Waltrip

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Appellee sued as the assignee of a chose in action against appellant. To this, after defensive pleadings, appellant asserted a cross-action. Judgment was in favor of appellee and against appellant upon a jury verdict.

[1 -3] The appellee did not introduce in evidence his assignment, which was in writing. It had been introduced in evidence on a former trial, and was handled in this trial in the presence of the jury, and concerning it and its contents and the fact of an assignment, much testimony is in the record. We do not deem it necessary to discuss the sufficiency of such…